ORGANIZED CRIME AND TERRORISM WORLDWIDE: MOTHERS WITH BLOOD AND CONSUMER DURABLES

Sunday, 10 July 2011

MOTHERS WITH BLOOD AND CONSUMER DURABLES

THE GHOST OF SEX UNIVERSITY -
16TH SAMSKARA OF DEATH
DAYANAND SARASWATI -ARYA SAMAJ 1875
DEATH 1883
ARYA SAMAJ ACT 1937 TO KILL MOTHERS AFTER 20 YEARS OF MARRIAGE TO PROMOTE USE AND THROW AND FINISH HINDU RELIGION BY SEX UNIVERSITY /BUREAUCRACY/CIVIL JUDICIARY ACHIEVEMENTS

Jaani Dushman (1979)

Chalo Re Doli Uthao (FullVersion) MOHD RAFI - Jaani Dushman

08:01 From: MdAzgarKhan

jaani dushman

http://www.aiuweb.org/organisation/organisation.asp

President	Prof. S K Mukherjee Vice Chancellor Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra Ranchi 835 215

Vice President	Prof. A M Pathan Vice Chanclellor Maulana Azad National Urdu University Gachibowi Hyderabad 500 032

Immediate Past President	Vacant

Secretary General	Prof. Dayanand Dongaonkar AIU House, 16 Comrade Indrajit Gupta Marg New Delhi - 110 002.

1 To 3 of 3 Search for : indira gandhi

1	R.L.GUPTA & ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.	Coram: VENKATARAMIAH E.S. (J)	16/03/1988
2	P.N. DUDA Vs. v. P. SHIV SHANKAR & OTHERS	Coram: MUKHARJI SABYASACHI (J)	15/04/1988
3	KEHAR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE (DELHI ADMN.)	Coram: OZA G.L. (J)	03/08/1988
Previous Page Next Page

Supreme Court Of India

CBI CONTROL ROOM
Block No. 3, Ground Floor, CGO Complex,
Lodi Road, New Delhi -110 003.
Tele : 91-11-24361273
Fax:91-11-24364130

Dear Sir,

Here is a copy of the letter I had sent to the press regarding AYODHYA CELL,and intervention judiciously ,for all seeking justice at the Ayodhya cell,through the use of Social Psychology as an intervention procedure ,by virtue of the Clause 45 -INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT-"OPINION OF EXPERTS".PLEASE FORWARD TO RELEVANT AUTHORITY.

To,Group mind

The Editor ,

Hindustan times.

This is in response to the Centre’s counsel mr.gUPTA ‘S OPINIONS ABOUT THE Babri Masjid demolition.In a country like INDIA where Hinduism is the prime religion and the sentiments of the people are warmly connected to Lord RAM how can you justify the actions of a mob without studying the underlying psychology of the whole nation.Mr.gupta’s statement frenzied kar sewaks”suddenly and surprisingly rushed to demolish the structure are totally categorical and insulting to an entire nation whose very religion stands threatened and the people who dare to fight for their rights –to be sent to KALA PANI?SHAME –SHAME.THE LIBERHANS COMMISSION SHOULD HAVE A FEW SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGISTS STUDYING MOB MOTIVATION TO RIGHTLY JUSTIFY AS TO EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED ON DEC.6^TH 1992.

LET ME JUSTIFY –

IT IS A MATTER OF COMMON EXPERIENCE THAT WHEN ONE PARTICIPATES IN A CROWD ONE’S BEHAVIOUR UNDERGOES SOME MODIFICATION,AND IT IS OFTEN DIFFICULT TO RECONCILE THE BEHAVIOUR OF AN INDIVIDUAL IN A CROWD WITH HIS BEHAVIOUR IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY.THIS IS THE :”GROUP MIND”

ACCORDING TO THIS CONCEPTION, THE GROUP HAS A MIND OF ITS OWN APART FROM THE MIND OF THE INDIVIDUAL,THAT IS WHEN THE MINDS OF THE VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS COMBINE TO FORM A NEW MIND AND WHEN THIS MIND DIRECTS THE CONDUCT OF THE CROWD THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE INDIVIDUAL IS MODIFIED.THE MENTAL RELATIONS OF THE MEMBERS OF A GROUP COMBINE TO GIVE EXISTENCE TO “THE GROUP MIND.”

IN HIS BOOK “CROWD”,LEBON HAS WRITTEN,”THE SENTIMENTS AND IDEAS OF ALL THE PERSONS IN THE GATHERING TAKE ONE AND THE SAME DIRECTION AND THEIR CONSCIOUS PERSONALITY VANISHES.A COLLECTIVE MIND IS FORMED,DOUBTLESS TRANSITORY BUT PRESENTING VERY CLEARLY DEFINED CHARACTERISTICS.IN THIS WAY,ACCORDING TO LEBON, THE DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS OF A GROUP IN A GATHERING DO NOT THINK INDIVIDUALLY BUT THINK ,EXPERIENCE AND ACT THROUGH THE GROUP MIND .IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES THE LIFE ,VOCATION,CHARACTER,INTELLECT,THOUGHTS,ETC. OF THESE INDIVIDUALS EXHIBIT ADEQUATE DIFFERENCES AND FOR THIS REASON THEY DIFFER FROM EACH OTHER MATERIALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY.BUT IN A GATHERING EVERY INDIVIDUAL IS TRANSFORMED,AS IF HIS OWN MIND BECOMES A PART OF THE “COLLECTIVE MIND”.

LEBON CONTENDS THAT IN A CROWD THE COLLECTIVE UNCONSCIOUS IS AWAKENED DUE TO WHICH THERE IS A MARKED SIMILARITY BETWEEN AN INDIVIDUAL’S BEHAVIOUR AND THE CONDUCT OF THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE CROWD EVEN THOUGH HIS ACTIONS DIFFER FROM WHAT THEY ARE OTHERWISE,DUE TO A PSYCHOLOGICAL MUTUAL BOND.

ESPINAS, A FRENCH AUTHOR -THIS SAME VIEW IS PUT FORTH IN A TERM”SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS”,IN WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL DISCARDS HIS INDIVIDUALITY AND ASSUMES THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN A GATHERING.THUS BABRI MASJID DEMOLITION WAS NOT AN ACT PROPOUNDED BY ANY INDIVIDUAL BUT REPRESENTED THE SOCIAL CONSCIOUSNESS AT THAT TIME.

ACCORDING TO ESPINAS,THERE IS A SORT OF SELF CONSCIOUSNESS IN EVERY SOCIETY AND IT IS BECAUSE OF THIS EXISTENCE THAT WHEN ITS CULTURE IS ATTACKED FROM OUTSIDE IT RAISES A VOICE AGAINST IT.

DURKEHEIM CONSIDERS THE GROUP MIND TO BE SUPERIOR TO THE INDIVIDUAL MIND.BECAUSE OF A RESULT OF EXCHANGE IN VIEWS THAT TAKES PLACE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUALS IT BECOMES MORE COMPREHENSIVE AND EXTENSIVE AND HENCE MORE PERFECT..IT IS THEN DEVOID OF MANY INDIVIDUAL SHORTCOMINGS THAT BEHEST THE INDIVIDUAL INTELLECT.IT IS FURTHER CONTENTED BY DUR KHEIM THAT THE CREDIT FOR MANY FORMS OF INDIVIDUAL THINKING GO TO THE GROUP MIND.THUS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ACTIONS RESULTING IN MOB BEHAVIOUR IS A PRODUCT OF THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL CONSCIOUSNESS.THIS IS CREATED BY THE TRADITIONS OF SOCIAL LIFE BECAUSE THESE TRADITIONS ARE ATTACHED TO THE CONCEPTS OF PAST ,PRESENT AND FUTURE, AND IT IS BY THE VIRTUE OF THESE THAT THE LIFE OF ALL THE MEMBERS IN A GROUP IS FACILIATED AND DIRECTED.

THUS GROUP MIND IS NOT A MERE COLLECTION OF THE MINDS OF ALL THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF A GROUP.IT HAS AN EXISTENCE EVEN APART FROM THE MINDS OF THE INDIVIDUALS AND HAS SOME CHARACTERISTICS THAT HAVE THE POWER OF INFLUENCING THE MINDS OF THE INDIVIDUALS-AND THAT IS A COMMON GOAL AND GOD.

ACCORDING TO ALLPORT TWO PROCESSES ARE ACTIVE IN GROUP BEHAVIOR-1.SOCIAL FACILITATION 2.INTERSTIMULATION..BECAUSE OF THIS PROCESS OF SOCIAL FACILITATION ALL THE INDIVIDUALS ARE SEEN BEHAVING IN AN IDENTICAL MANNER.IN A GROUP WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL REACTS TO A PARTICULAR STIMULUS IN A PARTICULAR MANNER,THEN BECAUSE OF SOCIAL FACILITATION ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL IS MOTIVATED TO ACT IN A SIMILAR MANNER.IN THIS MANNER THE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY MOTIVATE EACH OTHER AND HENCE ARE INTER STIMULATED.BECAUSE OF THIS INTER STIMULATION THE MEMBERS OF THE GROUP FEEL POSSESSED OF AN UNCONQUERABLE POWER.BECAUSE OF SOCIAL FACILITATION AND INTER STIMULATION THE REASONING CAPACITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL IS PACIFIED,WHILE THEIR SUGGESTIBILITY INCREASES AND THEY CONSEQUENTLY INDULGE IN MANY ACTIVITIES THAT THEY WOULD AVOID IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY.A FEW DAYS BACK THE NEWS PAPERS HIGHLIGHTED THE POWER OF THE 50 MUSLIM COUNTRIES AND 125 –CHRISTAIN .SO HINDUS CANNOT HAVE AYODHYA AS THEIR POWER IN NUMBERS WILL SMASH EVEN OUR RELIGION AND UPHOLD ONLY BARBARIC TROPHIES OF STRENGTH!

IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY SOME THEORISTS CONTEND THAT BESIDES THE INDIVIDUAL VOLITION THERE EXISTS A GENERAL WILL.THIS IS THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.THIS IS AN ACT OF VOLITION WHICH IN CORPORATES THE WILL OF ALL INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE GROUP.IN THIS WAY THE GENERAL WILL CONNOTES THE COMMUNAL OR COLLECTIVE WILL WHICH POSSESSES EXISTENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS DISTINCT FROM THE VARIOUS INDIVIDUAL WILLS AND WHICH CAUSES SOME CHANGE IN THE CONDUCT OF THE INDIVIDUALS WHO TAKE PART IN IT. THIS CHANGE IN THE INDIVIDUAL’S WILL IS DUE TO HIS HAVING TAKEN PART IN AND HAVING FORMED A PART OF THIS GENERAL WILL.IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE GENERAL WILL IS STRONGER THAN THE INDIVIDUAL’S ACTS OF VOLITION.IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY THE CONCEPT AND THE THEORY OF THE GENERAL WILL IS CONJOINED TO THE PRINCIPLE OF THE GROUP MIND..ROUSSEAU HAS IN PARTICULAR STRESSED THE FOLLOWING THREE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GENERAL WILL1.PERMENANCE 2.PROPRIETY AND 3.UNITY..THE AIM OF THE GENERAL WILL IS TO ACHIEVE THE INTERESTS AND BENEFITS OF ALL THE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY.WHEN THE MAJOR PART OF THE COMMUNITY THINKS IN AN IDENTICAL MANNER UPON SOME SUBJECT FOR THE WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY THEN IN SUCH A SITUATION THERE IS REFLECTED A GENERAL WILL.

THUS AYODHYA REFLECTS THE PSYCHE OF THE HINDUSTANI NATION.THERE HAS TO BE SOME CHANGE AT THE CHANGE OF THE CENTURY.SO WILL THE HINDUS GET AN AYODHYA AT PAR WITH MECCA OR ROME.STRENGTH INSPIRES STRENGTH AND THERE HAS TO BE A COMMON GOAL TO UNITE ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE HINDU SOCIETY.FOR WHAT IS IT THAT WE ALL CHANT AT THE END OF A GOD GIFTED LIFE LIVED FRUITFULLY.ON THE LAST LADDER IS IT NOT”RAM NAAM SATYA HAI”-

Mamta Dhody

1513,Outram Lane,

Mukherjee Nagar,

Delhi-110009.

Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru (Hindi: जवाहरलाल नेहरू, IPA: [dʒəvaːhərlaːl nehruː], from Persian Javâher-e La'al, meaning 'Red Jewel') (November 14, 1889 – May 27, 1964)

Indira Priyadarshini Gandhi (Hindi: इंदिरा प्रियदर्शिनी गांधी Indirā Priyadarśinī Gāndhī) (19 November 1917 - October 31, 1984) was the Prime Minister of India for three consecutive terms from 1966 to 1977 and for a fourth term from 1980 until her assassination in 1984.

The domes of the Babri Masjid after they were damaged by kar sevaks on October 31, 1991.

The November 22-24, 1989 general elections witnessed the worst ever communal violence in independent India's electoral history and took a massive toll of 800 lives in the Hindi belt. V. P. Singh became Prime Minister with the support of the BJP, which won 88 seats in the new Lok Sabha. The V. P. Singh regime ushered in the judicial process by getting a special Bench established at the Allahabad High Court on January 8, 1990 and pleading for a ban on construction until the title to the disputed site could be decided and the site plan approved. The Special Court called upon the U.P. Government to clarify the status of the site. A Hindu priest filed a writ petition seeking permission to construct the temple at the spot of the shilanyas that was performed on November 9, 1989. Having been directed by the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court to file a counter-affidavit, the Central Government maintained that no construction could be allowed unless all the civil suits pending before the special bench of the High Court were decided.²⁶

On January 12, 1990, the Supreme Court allowed the "Hindu" representatives to raise a preliminary issue before the full Bench of the High Court that the suit by the Sunni Waqf on behalf of Muslims was not maintainable. The Bench, however, decided that it would not interfere with the October 23, 1989 order of the Lucknow Bench before taking evidence for the trial of all the five suits which were 28 to 39 years old in their pendency in the District Court. The VHP appealed to the Supreme Court that the Sunni Waqf suit filed on December 18, 1961 be dismissed on the grounds it cited.

Meanwhile, the All India Babri Masjid Action Committee (AIBMAC) revived its earlier demand made at its December 25, 1989 meeting that if a negotiated settlement failed, the dispute should be decided by High Court judges "of some South Indian State, none of whom should be either Hindu or Muslim." The RSS mouthpiece, Organiser of January 14, 1990 took exception to this revived claim and V. P. Singh's meeting with Muslim leaders and claimed that it "was not a case about the title of a place but of undoing a historical wrong and for that matter no court could decide it." They would rather follow the guidance of the Dharmacharya Sammelan (gathering of religious heads) to be held on January 27-28, 1990 at Allahabad.²⁷

The "auspicious" February 14 was chosen to begin temple construction, and V.P. Singh managed with great difficulty to get the date changed by pointing out the grave situation in Kashmir and Punjab. As the Hindutva groups' June 8 deadline passed without any settlement plan from the Government, the VHP meeting in Hardwar decided to begin construction from October 30.

With this backdrop, V. P. Singh introduced the reservation bill in the Lok Sabha on August 7, 1990 and "upper caste" Hindus rose in revolt. With Brahmin youth immolating themselves in northern India, L.K. Advani set out in September on his 10,000-km "rath yatra" (chariot procession) to carry out the Ayodhya construction and to force the Government to hand over the site to the Hindutva forces. When Advani and his cohorts were arrested in Bihar on October 23, the BJP withdrew its support to the Government and the V. P. Singh Ministry fell on November 9.